🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension triggered by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its response: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are delivered from multiple capitals. Significant resources is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the main instrument for achieving "peace".

Nocturnal Warfare

As Russia's attack developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from across the border, a ability afforded by timely intelligence. From observation points, defense planes that had been deployed to intercept incoming aerial threats streaked across the sky – modern combat jets delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: defensive missiles targeted at a incoming threat. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably provided by partner states. Every firing jolts you unexpectedly, causing tremors. The moment of terror quickly becomes grim resignation: possibly the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from catastrophe and another blackout.

Ongoing Risks

Following this, a automatic firearm fired at a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a rapid response unit – almost certainly allied-provided weaponry. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: seven people killed, damage and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those entire period illustrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a need that European nations are demonstrably unable to fill in the short term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The 28-point plan from American leadership provoked deep reactions, controversy and profound anxiety – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new proposal from US leadership adheres to the same pattern: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, effectively counters. They contain the crisis but never actually win the battle. This trend will, undoubtedly, continue.

Political Considerations

It is easy to blame specific actors of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration functions according to a assumption well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have failed to defend militarily. The US administration believes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to surrender the territory that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The issue is that while acknowledging this situation, US leadership does little to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from thinking that the current condition will not change more in its favour in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their motivation to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing people and territory but preventing a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its benefit.

Present Conditions

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: leadership ambitions to broker a ceasefire and achieve global acclaim, and Kyiv's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains quite doubtful that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to kill the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new plans based on established approaches are approaching, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect specific hesitation to alter the situation, if they stand together and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on continued Western support.